What process is used in Trusted Computer tagging to assess Integrity Monitoring Events?

The process used in Trusted Computer tagging to assess Integrity Monitoring Events involves comparing both before and after states. This dual-state comparison is crucial for accurately detecting any unauthorized changes to the system or data being monitored. By analyzing both the state prior to a change and the state after the change, the system can establish a baseline of expected integrity. This allows for a more comprehensive understanding of potential integrity violations, as it can pinpoint exactly what has changed over time.

In Integrity Monitoring, simply looking at either the before or after state would not provide enough information to determine the health and integrity of the system. For instance, if only the after state were analyzed, it could lead to overlooking critical changes that had occurred without appropriate context regarding what had existed previously.

The other methods listed, such as analyzing data from a centralized server or utilizing predefined thresholds, do not encompass the full requirement for assessing Integrity Monitoring Events through Trusted Computer tagging, which fundamentally relies on the before-and-after analysis to identify discrepancies effectively. Thus, comparing both states provides a robust and accurate means to assess integrity.